The Benefits Academy
  • Home
  • Products
  • WA State Long Term Care
    • The TBA Alternative
    • More LTC Info
    • LTC Calculator
  • Our Story
    • Fan Page
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Agent Login

Benefits Bites

Opening the AHP Floodgates? Part 1 of 2

8/14/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
​In Washington State, we saw the tightening of the Association Health Plan (AHP) markets when it was decreed that only AHPs that represented specific industries (denoted by NAICS codes) could continue to operate under large-group rating rules.  At that time, our options for most employers were cut in half. 
  
With the release of final AHP regulations in June, our State’s AHP options may be able to expand to “like groups” and “like geographies”.  Plus Sole Proprietors, Partners, and other “working owners” could be added as eligible employers for  AHP group-based coverage.

In Washington State, we saw the tightening of the Association Health Plan (AHP) markets when it was decreed that only AHPs representing specific industries (denoted by NAICS codes) could continue to operate under large-group rating rules.  The result was that options for most employers were cut in half.    
​
On June 21, 2018, the Department of Labor (DOL) published their final rules expanding the criteria that groups and associations can use when forming an Association Health Plan (AHP).  This is important, since the final rules retain the option of AHPs to form (or continue) under the prior rules, meaning our current State AHPs will not be kicked to the curb.  Just as important, the new regulations also amended the definition of “Employer” under ERISA Section 3(5) – opening the door for AHPs to allow Sole Proprietors, Partners, and other “working owners” to enroll for AHP group-based coverage.  
Effective Date
The new rules kick in rather quickly.  The DOL has provided a staggered approach:
  • 9/1/2018 – all existing and new groups or associations can establish a fully-insured AHP
  • 1/1/2019 – existing self-funded AHPs can expand based on the new rules
  • 4/1/2019 – all remaining groups or associations can establish a self-insured AHP
Retaining the Current Rules
The new rules retain the current rules and expand them. This really matters. Current rules allow AHPs that are “bona fide” to rate each employer group under the AHP based on a number of factors including actual claims.  More costly groups in the AHP can receive higher renewal rates than lower cost groups in the same AHP. Plus these AHPs can exercise “last look” where they can shave a few points off of a renewal if other carriers are coming in competitively on a group that is healthy. 
The rules specifically note that rather than only grandfather “old AHP” program rules, the DOL is leaving the door open for groups or associations to continue to form new AHPs under these retained older rules. 

A More Flexible “Commonality of Interest”
Under expanded AHP rules, a group or association will still be able to include employers in the same trade, industry, line of business, or profession (I’ll call this “like employers”). But they won’t need to follow a set of NAICS codes. They’ll also be able to compartmentalize their membership, an example might be including cloud storage companies, but not all IT companies; or including only restaurant owners who are also veterans. These “like employer” programs will be allowed to cross state lines and sell in all or some states. 

In addition, new AHP rules would allow employers in “like geographies” to band together. This could be in an entire state or in a city, county, or other region within the boundaries of the same state.  For example, an AHP could be provided to those in a city and the areas from which that city draws commuters.  The same as “like employers,” a geographic program can winnow down employers who are eligible.  For example, a group with the same shared moral convictions can sponsor an AHP, provided they satisfy the geography standard. 

The “like geography” program rules include one exception that would allow the AHP to cross state lines – in the event that it provides membership to those in a metropolitan area that includes more than one state (a good example would be Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR).  While the rules note that the Metropolitan Statistical Area listing could be used to determine the boundaries of a metropolitan area, they specifically state that no such listing must be followed (similar to the “like employers” rule not requiring the use of NAICS codes). 

But don’t get too excited. These new types of AHPs will require the approval of the State’s Insurance Commissioner in every state that the AHP is offered. Fully insured AHPs will need to follow each state’s mandates, plus the Commissioner can require self-funded AHPs to comply with state mandates as well. 

Definition of Employers
The rules also expand which businesses can be considered “Employers.” For the purposes of AHP eligibility, the group or association can include working owners even if they have no common law employees, or if they are partners in a partnership, whether incorporated or unincorporated.  This expansion applies not only to the new types of AHPs, but also to the existing type.  Again, don’t get too excited about this one – the regulations do not require AHPs, nor their underlying insurers, to include this new classification of employers as members of the AHP. 

It should be noted that if an AHP includes working owners, the employer will need to provide verification that a business exists. If relying on hours worked, the rules set the bar at a minimum of 20 hours a week or 80 hours a month. If wages are relied upon, the working owner must have wages that are at least equal to the owner’s cost of coverage under the AHP.   

Other Business Purpose
Existing AHP rules stipulate that a group or association cannot be formed solely to offer health benefits.  This is not necessarily the case when forming an AHP under the new regulations. Of course, there are some caveats. 

The group or association must have at least one “substantial business purpose” unrelated to providing health benefits, although it does not need to be their primary purpose. The regulations provide some examples of a “substantial business purpose” that would qualify:  an organization that establishes business standards or practices or a program that advances the well-being of the industry in which its members operate. In addition, the new rules are clear that the group or association does not need to be a for-profit entity. 

Additionally, the group or association must be controlled by its employer members. There must be by-laws and other similar indications of formality, there must be a formal organizational structure with a governing body, and the AHP must be controlled by employer members who are actually participating in the AHP.

Response from the States
There are three areas of litigation or rule-making to watch (so far):
  • 12 States’ Attorneys General (including Washington’s) have filed a lawsuit, with the goal of reversing the rule allowing self-employed individuals to participating in AHPs. 
  • Vermont has already taken steps to require that AHP program managers meet strict financial standards. 
  • California is weighing a bill that would require AHPs to meet Obamacare coverage standards. 

​Stay tuned for Part 2

Later this month, we’ll delve further into the nitty-gritty requirements outlined in the AHP expanded rules.  
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    This section will not be visible in live published website. Below are your current settings:


    Current Number Of Columns are = 1

    Expand Posts Area =

    Gap/Space Between Posts = 10px

    Blog Post Style = card

    Use of custom card colors instead of default colors =

    Blog Post Card Background Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Shadow Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Border Color = current color

    Publish the website and visit your blog page to see the results

    About Sandy

    I love numbers.  I'm a math geek. I read benefits industry articles and periodicals for relaxation (but, honestly, I'm still a fun gal).  I also like to share what I've learned and you'll find it all here.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    September 2022
    July 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016

    Categories

    All
    2017
    2018
    2019
    2020
    2021
    2022
    2023
    ACA
    ACA Lawsuits
    ACA Reporting
    ADA
    Aetna
    Age-banded Rates
    AHP
    Ambetter
    Association Health Plans
    Associations
    Asuris
    Balanced Billing
    Benefit Bites
    Benefits Coordination
    Biden Administration
    Bridgespan
    Bridge Span
    Busy Season
    Carrier Corner
    Carrier Exit
    Cascade Care
    CMS
    COBRA
    Community Health Plan
    Community Rated Plans
    Compliance Notices
    Continuation
    Conversion
    Coordinated Care
    Coronavirus
    Cost Sharing Programs
    Cost Sharing Reduction
    Data Match
    Dependents
    Direct Primary Care Programs
    Disability Insurance
    Domestic Partners
    EIDL
    Executive Order
    Facility Fees
    Facility Scope Creep
    FAIR Health
    FFCRA
    FSA
    Group Health
    Group Life
    HDHP
    Health Alliance NW
    Healthnet
    Health Savings Account
    Heart Health
    HRA
    HSA
    ICHRA
    Individual
    Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangement
    Individualized Medicine
    Individual Mandate
    Individual Penalty
    IRS
    Kaiser
    Kaiser NW
    Kaiser WA
    Life Insurance
    Lifewise
    Long Term Care
    Long Term Care Services And Support Trust Act
    Mandate
    Medicaid
    Medicare
    Medicare For All
    Micro Group
    Moda
    Molina
    Monthly Freebies
    Networks
    Nondiscrimination Testing
    Notice Requirements
    Paid Family & Medical Leave
    Pandemic
    Part D
    Partnership
    PCT Updates
    Penalties
    PFML
    Pharmacogenomics
    Plan Comparison Tool
    Portability
    PPO Networks
    PPP
    Premera
    Prescription Assistance Programs
    Pre-Tax Premiums
    Providence
    PTO
    Public Option
    QSEHRA
    Rates
    Referenced Based Pricing
    Regence
    Regence OR
    Reinsurance
    Renewals
    Repeal
    Risk Adjustment
    Risk Corridor
    Rx Copay Accumulator Programs
    S-Corp
    Section 105(h)
    Section 125
    Section 79
    Self Funded
    Self-funded
    Short Term Medical Plans
    Single Payer
    Small Employer Health Credit
    Small Group
    Social Distancing
    Stimulus
    Subsidies
    Tax Credits
    Trump
    Trust Plans
    Uninsured
    United Hea
    United Healthcare
    Vetted Vendor
    WA Cares
    WA LTC
    WA OIC
    Washington State
    Wellness Program

    RSS Feed

Services

Products
Resources

Company

Our Story
Blog
​Fans

Support

Contact
​Agent Login
© COPYRIGHT 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • Products
  • WA State Long Term Care
    • The TBA Alternative
    • More LTC Info
    • LTC Calculator
  • Our Story
    • Fan Page
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Agent Login