The Benefits Academy
  • Home
  • Products
  • WA State Long Term Care
    • The TBA Alternative
    • More LTC Info
    • LTC Calculator
  • Our Story
    • Fan Page
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Agent Login

Benefits Bites

Nondiscrimination rules = a big can of worms

10/31/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture

​If your clients pay premiums based on employee class, you may want to have a benefits consultant on speed dial. Here's why.

I was recently asked about nondiscrimination rules and how they affect employers who contribute different amounts of premium toward different employee classes. Then another question came in asking if owners of an S-Corp can be excluded from the various testing that the nondiscrimination rules require.  It seems when one of these questions comes in, more follow.  So, I set about researching to see if I could translate the regulations into something resembling English.  And opened a can of worms….
 
As of this blog post, I am still nailing down the ins and outs of this exciting topic (yes, tongue in cheek here) and trying to decode the regulations.  Lucky you, I won’t bore you with the details…yet.  I figure since you are in the heat of the Q4 battle, I won’t push you over the edge.
 
Let me just provide some FAQs that you may want to know about as you work on your renewals.  I am not providing you with any of the testing rules, or how to do the calculations.  It will only give you a headache.  Suffice it to say that if your client has a plan that is self-funded (including an HRA or an FSA), make sure the vendor does the Section 105(h) testing on those plans.  Then, for the Section 125 plan (including just a Premium Only Plan), the vendor should be conducting the “typical” nondiscrimination testing – there are three of them.  If you need vendor recommendations, let me know!

Here are some common scenarios and the basic answers to the questions of:
​ 
1) What nondiscrimination tests are required and, 
2) Where the danger of failing lies.

Please note, as I mentioned above, these rules are very complex and this information is only provided as a guide.


Q: If a company pays more, in premium or contributions, for certain classes of employees, what are the potential nondiscrimination issues?

​A: If the plan is self-funded, the plan will fail the Section 105(h) discrimination testing. The company will need to provide the same employer contribution for all classes of employees. If the plan is fully insured, this section of the rules does not apply to the plan; however, if the plan is fully insured and the company offers an FSA, they will need to go through Section 125 testing to determine if the plan passes those nondiscrimination rules.

Q: If a company pays the same toward all employees’ premiums, offers the same benefit plans to all employees, and all employees have the same waiting periods, will the plan automatically pass nondiscrimination testing?
​

A: Not necessarily.  If the plan is self-funded, the plan will pass the first test of the Section 105(h) rules, called the Benefits Test, but it will still need to pass the Section 105(h) Eligibility Test.  Plus, if premiums run through a Section 125 plan, the plans will also need to pass the Section 125 Eligibility Test, Contributions & Benefits Test, and Key Employee Concentration Test.  If the plan is fully insured, and premiums run through a Section 125, the plan will also need to pass these same three Section 125 tests.

Q: A company is an S-Corp and the owners are not considered “employees” – can they be excluded from the Section 105(h) nondiscrimination testing (for a self-funded plan) and the Section 125 nondiscrimination testing (for the Section 125 program)?

​A: Some of the tests are based on headcounts and/or total carrier premiums and do not allow a company to remove owners, partners, etc.  It may seem counterintuitive, since some individuals in a company may not be allowed to run premiums pre-tax through a Section 125 plan, but they’ll still need to be included in some of the required tests.

Q: A company is a Partnership and provides only fully insured plans.  If they pay 100% of the partners’ premiums and 75% of all other employees’ premiums will they fail the nondiscrimination testing?

​A: Since this company’s plans are fully insured, they will need to pass only the Section 125 nondiscrimination testing.  Covering different amounts by class will not cause a plan to automatically fail.  A company will need to go through the Section 125 testing to see if they pass.

​No doubt, there are dozens more scenarios than I have outlined and probably hundreds more outcomes based on all the permutations. My best advice, if you have a client offering different levels of benefits to different classes of employees is:
 
a) Make darn sure your client knows there may be nondiscrimination issues
b) Be joined at the hip with an uber-knowledgeable TPA, and/or
c) Have a benefits consultant or attorney on speed dial
 
Or, pray your client doesn’t find themselves being audited by the DOL.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    This section will not be visible in live published website. Below are your current settings:


    Current Number Of Columns are = 1

    Expand Posts Area =

    Gap/Space Between Posts = 10px

    Blog Post Style = card

    Use of custom card colors instead of default colors =

    Blog Post Card Background Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Shadow Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Border Color = current color

    Publish the website and visit your blog page to see the results

    About Sandy

    I love numbers.  I'm a math geek. I read benefits industry articles and periodicals for relaxation (but, honestly, I'm still a fun gal).  I also like to share what I've learned and you'll find it all here.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    September 2022
    July 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016

    Categories

    All
    2017
    2018
    2019
    2020
    2021
    2022
    2023
    ACA
    ACA Lawsuits
    ACA Reporting
    ADA
    Aetna
    Age-banded Rates
    AHP
    Ambetter
    Association Health Plans
    Associations
    Asuris
    Balanced Billing
    Benefit Bites
    Benefits Coordination
    Biden Administration
    Bridgespan
    Bridge Span
    Busy Season
    Carrier Corner
    Carrier Exit
    Cascade Care
    CMS
    COBRA
    Community Health Plan
    Community Rated Plans
    Compliance Notices
    Continuation
    Conversion
    Coordinated Care
    Coronavirus
    Cost Sharing Programs
    Cost Sharing Reduction
    Data Match
    Dependents
    Direct Primary Care Programs
    Disability Insurance
    Domestic Partners
    EIDL
    Executive Order
    Facility Fees
    Facility Scope Creep
    FAIR Health
    FFCRA
    FSA
    Group Health
    Group Life
    HDHP
    Health Alliance NW
    Healthnet
    Health Savings Account
    Heart Health
    HRA
    HSA
    ICHRA
    Individual
    Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangement
    Individualized Medicine
    Individual Mandate
    Individual Penalty
    IRS
    Kaiser
    Kaiser NW
    Kaiser WA
    Life Insurance
    Lifewise
    Long Term Care
    Long Term Care Services And Support Trust Act
    Mandate
    Medicaid
    Medicare
    Medicare For All
    Micro Group
    Moda
    Molina
    Monthly Freebies
    Networks
    Nondiscrimination Testing
    Notice Requirements
    Paid Family & Medical Leave
    Pandemic
    Part D
    Partnership
    PCT Updates
    Penalties
    PFML
    Pharmacogenomics
    Plan Comparison Tool
    Portability
    PPO Networks
    PPP
    Premera
    Prescription Assistance Programs
    Pre-Tax Premiums
    Providence
    PTO
    Public Option
    QSEHRA
    Rates
    Referenced Based Pricing
    Regence
    Regence OR
    Reinsurance
    Renewals
    Repeal
    Risk Adjustment
    Risk Corridor
    Rx Copay Accumulator Programs
    S-Corp
    Section 105(h)
    Section 125
    Section 79
    Self Funded
    Self-funded
    Short Term Medical Plans
    Single Payer
    Small Employer Health Credit
    Small Group
    Social Distancing
    Stimulus
    Subsidies
    Tax Credits
    Trump
    Trust Plans
    Uninsured
    United Hea
    United Healthcare
    Vetted Vendor
    WA Cares
    WA LTC
    WA OIC
    Washington State
    Wellness Program

    RSS Feed

Services

Products
Resources

Company

Our Story
Blog
​Fans

Support

Contact
​Agent Login
© COPYRIGHT 2020. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • Products
  • WA State Long Term Care
    • The TBA Alternative
    • More LTC Info
    • LTC Calculator
  • Our Story
    • Fan Page
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Agent Login