Congress is debating whether to shut off Cost Sharing Reductions under the ACA, but what will that cost taxpayers and the insurance marketplace in general?
There’s been a lot in the news recently about #45 threatening to defund the Cost Sharing Reductions (CSRs) under the Affordable Care Act. But this didn’t start with him, it started in the U.S. House of Representatives during the Obama administration.
Under the ACA, the CSRs were included to help lower income Americans afford health services. These are in addition to the Advanced Premium Tax Credits (aka Subsidies), which help lower income Americans afford health insurance premiums.
To make a long story short, the House sued HHS stating that the Cost Sharing payments should not be made to insurance companies without an explicit appropriation by Congress. The District judge agreed, HHS appealed, and payments are still permitted while waiting for the appeals process to make its way through the courts.
Most people have heard of the Federal Subsidies to help individuals purchase coverage on State Exchanges. But few realize that there are also Federal dollars flowing to insurance companies to reimburse them for lowering the “Cost Share” out-of-pocket expenses low-income Americans need to pay when they actually seek care.
Let’s do the math
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, over 6.4 million people were enrolled in a plan with CSRs in 2016. In Washington State, there were:
What would shutting off the CSR spigot do to the individual marketplace? It could spook carriers into jumping ship and no longer offering individual coverage. For carriers that remain, it will most definitely result in rate increases, which, according to Kaiser will most likely average over 19% nationally (this is over and above any annual increase that will already be needed). Depending on how many carriers leave the marketplace, this estimate could go much higher.
And that’s where the numbers fall apart for #45 and the House. Both Subsidies and Cost Shares are paid by the Federal Government. If the Feds pull the Cost Share funding, then rates increase. If rates increase, then the Feds will end up shelling out more in Subsidies. Would there be any true savings in the end if Congress kills funding for the CSRs? In fact, Kaiser calculates that there would actually be an increase in costs. To the tune of $2.3 billion in 2018 and a whopping $31 billion from 2018-2027.
Given those numbers, any reasonable person wouldn’t mess with the Cost Sharing Reductions. And it’s not only the cold hard cash. It is the individual market stabilization that is at risk, and it won’t just affect lower income Americans. It will affect everyone currently enrolled on individual coverage as well as future enrollees.
Will reason prevail?
This section will not be visible in live published website. Below are your current settings:
Current Number Of Columns are = 1
Expand Posts Area =
Gap/Space Between Posts = 10px
Blog Post Style = card
Use of custom card colors instead of default colors =
Blog Post Card Background Color = current color
Blog Post Card Shadow Color = current color
Blog Post Card Border Color = current color
Publish the website and visit your blog page to see the results
I love numbers. I'm a math geek. I read benefits industry articles and periodicals for relaxation (but, honestly, I'm still a fun gal). I also like to share what I've learned and you'll find it all here.